flaw – Coin Network News https://coinnetworknews.com If it's coin, it's news. Sun, 07 May 2023 04:25:31 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 Lawyer Expects SEC to Lose if It Sues Coinbase Due to ‘Fatal Flaw’ of Gary Gensler’s Own Making – Bitcoin News https://coinnetworknews.com/lawyer-expects-sec-to-lose-if-it-sues-coinbase-due-to-fatal-flaw-of-gary-genslers-own-making-bitcoin-news/ https://coinnetworknews.com/lawyer-expects-sec-to-lose-if-it-sues-coinbase-due-to-fatal-flaw-of-gary-genslers-own-making-bitcoin-news/#respond Sun, 07 May 2023 04:25:31 +0000 https://coinnetworknews.com/lawyer-expects-sec-to-lose-if-it-sues-coinbase-due-to-fatal-flaw-of-gary-genslers-own-making-bitcoin-news/

A lawyer has explained why the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will likely lose if the regulator takes crypto exchange Coinbase to court over alleged securities law violations. “The problem is entirely of Gary Gensler’s own making,” he stressed.

Lawyer Expects SEC to Lose Against Coinbase in Court

Lawyer James Murphy explained in a series of tweets Wednesday why he believes the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will lose if it takes Coinbase to court. Murphy started law firm Murphy & McGonigle in 2010 to represent clients in the securities and banking industries. The firm pivoted in 2017 toward representing emerging companies that leverage blockchain technology.

Referencing a Wells Notice, a formal communication that typically precedes a lawsuit, that the securities regulator sent the Nasdaq-listed cryptocurrency exchange in March, the lawyer opined:

If the SEC follows through on its threat to sue Coinbase, I believe the SEC will lose. The SEC’s case has a fatal flaw. And the problem is entirely of Gary Gensler’s own making.

Murphy explained that SEC Chairman Gensler himself said in his testimony to Congress on May 6, 2021, that the SEC does not have the authority to regulate cryptocurrency exchanges. Gensler’s testimony followed his confirmation by the U.S. Senate on April 14, 2021, to serve as chair of the SEC. He was sworn into office on April 17, 2021.

If the SEC files a lawsuit against Coinbase, the crypto exchange’s legal team “will surely zero in on the communications within the SEC leading up to Gensler’s May 6, 2021 testimony,” Murphy said, adding that “All testimony of an SEC Chairman is thoroughly vetted internally before they testify.”

Murphy stressed: “So there will be emails, meeting notes, memos, text messages, chats, and deposition testimony showing that: There was a consensus within the SEC that it lacked legal authority from Congress to regulate crypto exchanges.”

He continued:

If they sue Coinbase, the SEC’s lawyers will have the unenviable task of trying to explain away their own chairman’s testimony to Congress and all the documents and discussion that preceded it internally within the SEC … It’s a highly embarrassing prospect for the SEC.

“Even more damaging will be all the discovery Coinbase will conduct around Gensler’s decision to pull a 180-degree reversal and suddenly claim that the SEC does have the authority to regulate crypto exchanges in the absence of any Congressional authorization,” the lawyer emphasized. “His unequivocal testimony before Congress and his bizarre 180-degree reversal make Gary Gensler himself the star witness at trial — for Coinbase.”

Do you think the SEC will lose against Coinbase if it takes the crypto exchange to court over alleged securities law violations? Let us know in the comments section below.

Kevin Helms

A student of Austrian Economics, Kevin found Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open-source systems, network effects and the intersection between economics and cryptography.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.



Source link

]]>
https://coinnetworknews.com/lawyer-expects-sec-to-lose-if-it-sues-coinbase-due-to-fatal-flaw-of-gary-genslers-own-making-bitcoin-news/feed/ 0
OneKey says it’s fixed the flaw that got its hardware wallet hacked in 1 second https://coinnetworknews.com/onekey-says-its-fixed-the-flaw-that-got-its-hardware-wallet-hacked-in-1-second/ https://coinnetworknews.com/onekey-says-its-fixed-the-flaw-that-got-its-hardware-wallet-hacked-in-1-second/#respond Mon, 13 Feb 2023 03:44:57 +0000 https://coinnetworknews.com/onekey-says-its-fixed-the-flaw-that-got-its-hardware-wallet-hacked-in-1-second/

Crypto hardware wallet provider OneKey says it has already addressed a vulnerability in its firmware that allowed one of its hardware wallets to be hacked in one second flat.

On Feb. 10, a video on YouTube posted by cybersecurity startup Unciphered showed they had figured out a way to exploit a “Massive critical vulnerability” in order o “crack open” a OneKey Mini.

According to Eric Michaud, a partner at Unciphered, by disassembling the device and inserting coding, it was possible to return the OneKey Mini to “factory mode” and bypass the security pin, allowing a potential attacker to remove the mnemonic phrase used to recover a wallet. 

“You have the CPU and the secure element. The secure element is where you keep your crypto keys. Now, normally, the communications are encrypted between the CPU, where the processing is done, and the secure element,” Michaud explained.

“Well it turns out it wasn’t engineered to do so in this case. So what you could do is put a tool in the middle that monitors the communications and intercepts them and then injects their own commands,” he said, adding:

“We did that where it then tells the secure element it’s in factory mode and we can take your mnemonics out, which is your money in crypto.”

However, in a Feb. 10 statement, OneKey said it had already addressed the security flaw identified by Unciphered, noting that its hardware team had updated the security patch “earlier this year” without “anyone being affected,” and that “All disclosed vulnerabilities have been or are being fixed.”

“That said, with password phrases and basic security practices, even physical attacks disclosed by Unciphered will not affect OneKey users.” 

The company further highlighted that while the vulnerability was concerning, the attack vector identified by Unciphered can’t be used remotely and requires “disassembly of the device and physical access through a dedicated FPGA device in the lab to be possible to execute.”

According to OneKey, during correspondence with Unciphered, it was disclosed that other wallets have been found to have similar issues.

“We also paid Unciphered bounties to thank them for their contributions to OneKey’s security,” OneKey said.

Related: ‘Haunts me to this day’ — Crypto project hacked for $4M in a hotel lobby

In its blog post, OneKey has said it’s already gone to great pains to ensure the security of its users, including protecting them from supply chain attacks — when a hacker replaces a genuine wallet with one controlled by them. 

OneKey’s measures have included tamper-proof packaging for deliveries and the use of supply chain service providers from Apple to ensure stringent supply chain security management.

In the future, they hope to implement onboard authentication and upgrade newer hardware wallets with higher-level security components.

OneKey noted that the main purpose of hardware wallets has always been to protect users’ money from malware attacks, computer viruses and other remote dangers, but acknowledged that unfortunately, nothing can be 100% secure. 

“When we look at the entire hardware wallet manufacturing process, from silicon crystals to chip code, from firmware to software, it’s safe to say that with enough money, time and resources, any hardware barrier can be breached, even if it’s a nuclear weapon control system.”