loss – Coin Network News https://coinnetworknews.com If it's coin, it's news. Fri, 01 Mar 2024 19:13:31 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 Binance Hack Results in $70,000 Loss for Trader, Shares Unusual Experience – 247 Crypto News https://coinnetworknews.com/binance-hack-results-in-70000-loss-for-trader-shares-unusual-experience-247-crypto-news/ https://coinnetworknews.com/binance-hack-results-in-70000-loss-for-trader-shares-unusual-experience-247-crypto-news/#respond Fri, 01 Mar 2024 19:13:31 +0000 https://coinnetworknews.com/binance-hack-results-in-70000-loss-for-trader-shares-unusual-experience-247-crypto-news/

In a recent shocking incident, a trader lost a staggering $70,000 due to a Binance hack. This incident has raised concerns about the security measures of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange platform. This article delves into the details of the hack, the trader’s unusual experience, and the implications for the broader crypto community.

Unveiling the Binance Hack

On a seemingly ordinary day, a trader woke up to find his Binance account drained of $70,000 worth of cryptocurrency. The hacker had bypassed the two-factor authentication (2FA) and email confirmations, leaving the trader helpless and in shock. The incident has raised eyebrows about the security protocols of Binance and the safety of digital assets.

The Trader’s Unusual Experience

The trader, who wishes to remain anonymous, shared his unusual experience with the crypto community. He reported that he had received an email from Binance stating that his 2FA had been reset. He immediately tried to log into his account but found that his password had been changed. The hacker had not only bypassed the 2FA but also changed the email linked to the account, effectively locking the trader out.

How the Hack Happened

Investigations into the incident revealed that the hacker had gained access to the trader’s email account. From there, they reset the Binance password and 2FA, giving them full control over the account. The hacker then proceeded to drain the account of its funds, amounting to a loss of $70,000 for the trader.

  • The incident has sparked a debate about the security measures of cryptocurrency exchanges. Despite the advanced security protocols, hackers are finding ways to bypass them, leading to significant losses for traders.

  • It has also raised questions about the responsibility of exchanges in such incidents. Should they bear the losses, or is it solely the trader’s responsibility to secure their account?

  • Furthermore, it has highlighted the need for traders to secure their email accounts, as they are often the first point of attack for hackers.

Binance’s Response

Binance has stated that they are investigating the incident and will take necessary measures to prevent such incidents in the future. However, they have not committed to reimbursing the trader, stating that it is the user’s responsibility to secure their account and email.

Preventing Future Hacks

While Binance and other exchanges work on improving their security measures, traders can take steps to protect their accounts. These include using a unique and strong password, enabling 2FA, regularly updating security settings, and securing their email accounts.

Conclusion

The Binance hack resulting in a $70,000 loss for a trader is a stark reminder of the risks associated with cryptocurrency trading. It underscores the importance of robust security measures and the need for traders to be vigilant about their account security. While exchanges like Binance continue to enhance their security protocols, the onus is also on traders to protect their digital assets.

As the crypto community continues to grapple with these security challenges, one thing is clear: the need for enhanced security measures and user education is more critical than ever. The incident serves as a wake-up call for traders and exchanges alike, highlighting the high stakes in the world of cryptocurrency trading.

Source link

]]>
https://coinnetworknews.com/binance-hack-results-in-70000-loss-for-trader-shares-unusual-experience-247-crypto-news/feed/ 0
Bancor DAO hit with class-action suit over impermanent loss protection promises https://coinnetworknews.com/bancor-dao-hit-with-class-action-suit-over-impermanent-loss-protection-promises/ https://coinnetworknews.com/bancor-dao-hit-with-class-action-suit-over-impermanent-loss-protection-promises/#respond Tue, 16 May 2023 22:32:14 +0000 https://coinnetworknews.com/bancor-dao-hit-with-class-action-suit-over-impermanent-loss-protection-promises/

A group of investors has filed a class-action suit against the Bancor decentralized autonomous organization (DAO); its operator, BProtocol Foundation; and its founders in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The plaintiffs claim, among other things, that Bancor deceived investors about its impermanent loss protection (ILP) mechanism for liquidity providers and was an unregistered security. 

According to the suit, Bancor’s v2.1 investment product, introduced in October 2020 and the second to feature ILP, operated at a deficit that the defendants were aware of and tried to cover by launching a new product, v3, which promised “some of the most competitive returns anywhere […] without asking users to take on any risk.”

Impermanent loss occurs within the automated market maker model of decentralized finance when a liquidity provider deposits assets into a pool and one of the tokens involved loses value against another in the pool. It is called impermanent because trading conditions may restore the value of the token later. The loss is not realized unless the investor withdraws the token from the pool.

Related: Zircon Finance launches mainnet to mitigate impermanent loss on Moonriver

On June 19, 2022, Bancor experienced a spike in withdrawals, leading to a “pause” in ILP. Investors could still withdraw their assets, but they experienced the losses ILP was meant to prevent. This led to “losses approaching 50% of their LP [Liquidity Provider] Program investment,” amounting to tens of millions of dollars to U.S. retail investors, according to the suit.

In addition, the plaintiffs allege that the founders of the DAO retained control of it:

“Though Bancor is purportedly run by a decentralized autonomous organization (“Bancor DAO”), Defendants retain near-total control over Bancor, both directly (control over its capital, employees, and code) and indirectly (domination and manipulation of the Bancor DAO).”

They also claim that Bancor’s LP Program “is a binding investment contract and a security under U.S. law.” Moreover:

“Had Defendants complied with applicable registration and disclosure requirements, Plaintiffs and other class members would not have invested in the LP Program.”

The plaintiffs make six charges against the defendants of violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and Exchange Act of 1934, as well as breach of contract and unjust enrichment. They are demanding restitution, damages and interest.

Magazine: The legal dangers of getting involved with DAOs